Both at national and international level, purchasers like forestry companies require guarantees about the quality of services supplied to them by forestry workers, since the variety on offer is nowadays huge, especially when forestry workers of other countries are involved.
A European certificate of Forestry Workers can then serve as an independent description of the ability of a forestry worker to conduct the general elementary forestry activities, like for instance felling a tree with a power saw in a safe and regulated way. A forestry worker can do his or her job not only in his own country, but also in the other countries where the certificate is known and recognized as an important and valuable description of his or her ability. Such a certificate can even become obligatory for forestry workers who want to work at forestry companies in other countries.
In this proposal the first chapter describes the Leonardo-project Learn for Work, in which an attempt was made to develop a European function profile of a forestry worker. Based on this function profile a set of tests was constructed and empirically researched in several countries involved in the project. The last phase of the Leonardo-project was to describe a certification an accreditation system to establish, maintain and guarantee an objective and valid evaluation system to assess the European Standard of Forestry Workers. This report is the result of the last phase.
The second chapter describes a certification system in general and possible choices, that can be made when implementing such a certification system to maintain a European Standard of the ability of Forestry Workers, which is valid in all countries of Europe.
An important condition to be able to assess, guarantee and maintain a valid certification system is an accreditation of this certification system by an expert and independent institution. Different levels of accreditation and methods to validate these levels are described. Cito in The Netherlands is an organization which is able to conduct an expert and independent accreditation.
The last chapter of this proposal treats the implementation of the certification an accreditation system. Possible implementation methods are described and advantages and disadvantages of the possible choices are discussed.
The aim of the Leonardo-project Learn for Work was to develop a general European standard of a function profile of the forestry worker. The activities of this project are planned during the three years of 2004, 2005 and 2006.
Two or more members of institutes of Forestry Work in six different European countries are involved:
| Country | National Institute | Members and address |
| Austria |
Bundesamt und Forschungszentrum für Wald Seckendorff-Gudentweg 8 A-1131 Wien |
H. Zöscher J. Stamfer BFW Forstliche Ausbildungsstätte Ossiach 9570 Ossiach 21 |
| Belgium |
Inverde, Opleidingen bos-, groen- en natuurbeheer vzw Duboislaan 2 1560 Hoeilaart Belgium |
J. Vanbelle (Coordination and contact person) F. De Bleekere T. Embo |
| Finland |
Häme Vocational Institute Forestry Training P.O. Box 230 FIN 13101 HÄNEENLINNA |
P. Häkli E. Laitinen |
| France |
Centre Forestier de La Région Provence, Alpes, Côte d’Azur Pié de Gâche F 84240 La Bastide des Jourdans Vaucluse-France |
P. Caseau |
| Germany |
Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirection Süd Forstliches Bildungszentrum Rheinland-Pfalz In der Burgbitz 3 D-57627 Hachenburg |
M. Weber S. Wulf |
| Czech Republic |
Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry BRNO Zemedelska 1 613 00 BRNO |
A. Skoupy J. Kadlec J. Pecl |
The National Institute of Test Development in the Netherlands, called Cito, was asked to advise and support the project activities.
The first phase considered the research, analysis and development of a European function profile of the most important activities of forestry workers. This function profile is based on the descriptions of the activities of forestry workers in the six countries Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany and the Czech Republic. The general common activities in these six countries are analyzed and described in a table.
Then all activities were formulated as relevant aspects in a questionnaire. In the six countries some 50 forestry workers and ten privileged people rated all activities as very important, important or not important at all. So an ordered list was made of the most important activities of forestry workers.
This list can be regarded as an operationalisation of the activities of forestry workers in Europe to be examined to assess the important general abilities of forestry workers. The list was considered as a general description of the most important content of the test instruments. In a so-called ‘test grid’ every important topic was described, the test method was determined and was given a ranking of importance. The more important a topic, the more questions or scoring points must be given to this topic in the test instruments.
Based on this ‘test grid’ a practical test and three different versions of a paper based test were developed. To evaluate the performance level of a forestry worker candidates must pass a theoretical paper based examination and a practical examination.
The paper based examination consists op 60 multiple choice items and two open answer-items. The content of the questions is based on the test grid in the following page. For all content subjects listed in the first column in the table is determined whether knowledge (K), Skills (S) or Attitude (A) are involved. The a relative percentage was determined based on the relative importance of the subject in the test. The consequence of this percentage was translated in a number of multiple choice items and open questions in the test. The complete test grid is in Addendum A.
Two versions are initially tested in a limited field test in five countries. Unfortunately France was not involved in this field test.
The third test version is offered as an example test on the website of the Leonardo Project Learn for Work. Forestry workers can use this test as an exercise to test their basic knowledge and to get a picture of the items asked and the content the items are concerned with.
| Name | K | S | A | % | MC | open |
| 1.3 Basics of biology and ecology | X | 5 | 4 | |||
| 1.5 Occupational safety | 20 | 13 | ||||
| 1.5.3 - The basics of ergonomics. | 10 | 7 | ||||
| 2 Forest production and natural forestmanagement. | ||||||
| 2.1.1 The characteristics of the forestry work. | 3 | 3 | ||||
| 2.1.2 The importance of site preparation. | 1 | 2 | ||||
| 2.1.3 The processes of natural regeneration and forestmanagement. | 2 | 1 | ||||
| 2.1.4 Cultivation methods of forest plants. | 2 | 2 | ||||
| 2.1.5 Methods of artificial rejuvenation. | 4 | 3 | ||||
| 2.1.6 Planting methods. | 4 | 3 | ||||
| 2.3.2 Developing and tending - Tending and pruning. | 5 | |||||
| 3 Forest technology. | ||||||
| 3.1.1 Harvesting procedures in general. | 10 | 7 | ||||
| 3.1.4 Manual wood extraction. | 5 | |||||
| 3.4.1 The technical basics of tools and equipment in forestry. | 8 | 6 | ||||
| 3.4.2 Devices and machines used for forest activities or forest technology. safety standards, personal protections and different parts. A forestry worker also can place handles on tools and run these machines and tools. |
15 | 10 | ||||
| 5 Communication and social skills. | ||||||
| 5.1.1 The effects and importance of social relationships. | 6 | 1 | ||||
| 100 | 60 | 2 |
The practical examination consists of two parts:
The practical examination lasts about 120 minutes; the small maintenance task about 15 minutes plus 15 minutes preparation and evaluation, and the complex task in the forest lasts about 90 minutes in total.
To develop a standardized examination system of a European standard of Forestry Workers this chapters describes a possible examination system as a proposal to discuss about in the six different countries. When agreement is reached on the different aspects of this examination system, the examination system can be developed, tested and implemented in the different countries all over Europe.
By the way of person certification an employee or (commercial) enterprise can show objectively that he or she is competent to execute a certain function on a certain specified level. The characteristic of certification is that independent organizations and experts warrant that the necessary company demands really are tested. In some cases the general government offers these guarantees. In other cases (international) professional organizations can define these standardized demands. Then a register of all certified persons can be developed, which is maintained by a certification or an accreditation organization. The essence of person certification is that based on clear and explicit formulated demands of a function profile persons are tested in an objective and thoroughly elaborated way and that the certification only has a limited validity of for instance a period of three to five years.
For the certification of persons the following elements are important:
These elements will be discussed in this chapter.
In the Leonard- project Learn for Work a function profile is formulated and commented by forestry workers and privileged people in the six European countries involved. This function profile can be considered as a description of a European standard of forestry work. The function profile can be used as a common framework of a certification system of forestry workers in Europe.
In the Leonard- project Learn for Work also a set of test instruments is developed and validated in a very limited field test.. These instruments can be considered as examples of test instruments. They need further research and analysis. As a consequence of the research results more exam versions and other test instruments need to be developed.
A testing procedure must be elaborated, discussed with the important representative persons from the different European countries involved and be desctribed in a clear and explicit way. This Standard Testing Procedure can be tested, adjusted and be approved by all people involved. An important issue is always the clear identification of the candidates.
After the first development an accreditation organization checks and warrants this testing procedure. This can be considered as the second phase of the process. Finally the accreditation organization tests the execution of the procedure by checking a sample of test administrations on a regular base.
Not only the testing procedure must be considered, but also the process of scoring the several test results, judging the scores into ratings and finally distributing the unique and individual certificates. This can be considered the last steps of the testing procedure ad also has to be developed, discussed and agreed upon, tested and adjusted and approved by all organizations involved.
The accreditation organization will also consider the procedure of scoring, judging the scores and the distribution of the right and unique certificates. After checking, adjusting and warranting, this procedure will also be checked at a regular basis by samples in the different countries.
All countries involved must discuss the conditions, the content and the validity period of the certificates. The validity period determines the frequency of obligatory examinations. This frequency can function as a way to guarantee the commercial enterprises that a certified forestry worker every five years for instance must learn the latest methods of harvesting. The frequency can therefore be used as a way to enforce forestry workers to keep up with the latest technical developments in their field of forestry work.
In combination with the regulations about the certificates an examination document must be written, with all examination prescriptions.
An important part of a certification system is a method of verification of all certificates by establishing a general accessible list of certified forestry workers, per country. So every enterprise and every individual involved can check for themselves whether a certain forestry worker is certified and if so, when the validity period of his or her certificate is expired.
The last chapter describes the important elements of a certification system. To test and monitor these certification processes an independent and expert organization has to accreditate the certification processes on different levels. This chapter will elaborate the possible accreditation levels.
In general five different accreditation levels can be discriminated:
A well known method of certification is called the ISO-certification. The ISO-certification is mainly focussed on the management and organization level of the processes. All paperwork must be accurate, all processes must be described in so-called manuals and every complaint and action must be recorded in a transparent way. The ISO-system is therefore mainly focussed on the fourth and fifth accreditation level.
Cito is the dutch National Institute of Test Development in The Netherlands. Cito is an indepent organization, founded in 1968. It belongs to the top-3 institutes of test development of the world.
Cito develops all national examinations of the secondary education and supports the schools of primary education by providing diagnostic and final tests for the admission to the schools of secondary education. Also (parts of) examination systems for vocational education and for commercial enterprises are developed, tested and implemented. All these activities are supported by the large Research and Development Department of Cito.
Cito can conduct an accreditation of the certification system of the European Standard of Forestry Work. The advantage of Cito that all five accreditation levels can be checked, adjusted and warranted, not only the last two levels. So Cito can support the further development and implementation of the function profile. The construction and testing of the certification instruments is the core business of Cito. Cito can conduct and support the second accreditation level by all means very well. Also the training of assessors is a standardized training module of Cito Vocational Education, so our experience in this field will prove to be very valuable.
To be able to implement the certification and accreditation system of the European Standard of Forestry Workers, all components of the last two chapters must be described in detail, must be communicated and discussed in the relevant national organisations of forestry education and regulations and finally be warranted by a group of national and European representatives.
An important implementation aspect is the discussion and decision structure chosen. A lot of European countries will be involved in the certification system en it will be of great importance to give all countries possibilities to discuss and decide about the relevant aspects of the certification and accreditation system. All partners and countries can make their comments and annotations. So the approval and cooperation of all countries and organizations involved is optimized.
To determine an appropriate discussion and decision structure it can be necessary to make a national analysis of the vocational education system of forestry work and of the relevant players in the society of each country involved. For instance in one country the government can play an important role by regulating the certifications system of vocational education. In another country on the contrary the unions or commercial enterprises highly influence the certification of vocational education. This analysis can determine the important national factors in the countries.
A discussion and decision structure can be oriented nationally. All countries must then indicate one or two large and common institutes as the most important deciding factor in the country. This indication can be based on the afore mentioned analysis. This institute seeks partners in it’s own country. Possible partners can be commercial enterprises, education centres or governmental departments for instance. So for every country a large committee will be established to discuss about all relevant documents and give recommendations for the important decisions to be made in the international committee.
Representatives of these large and common institutes in al countries form the international Committee of the European Standard of Forestry Work.
Also all necessary documents must be developed and elaborated in further detail, for instance:
All these documents must be discussed in all countries involved. Final decisions can then be made about the relevant topics in the documents both at a national level in all countries and at an international level in the international Committee of the European Standard of Forestry Work.
To enhance the final approval of the documents by the selected accreditation institute or organization, it is recommended that the accreditation organization is consulted in an early stage of the process and that the recommendations of this accreditation organization are processed in the important documents.
Although the test instruments were tested in a limited way in five different countries, the amount of data in this field test is too limited to be able to draw statistically sound conclusions. Therefore it is recommended that the two paper based test versions and the practical test will be researched more thoroughly in a larger field test with al larger group of candidates in all countries involved.
Per country each paper based test version must then be taken by at least 150 to 250 candidates to analyze the tests in general (for instance the reliability of the total test, the average score, the standard deviation) and relevant parameters per item (like the p- and a-values per alternative of a multiple choice item and the correlations with the total test score).
The practical test must be taken by at least 100 candidates per country, observed and scored by at least two independent assessors per practical test. So the objective scoring of the practical test can be analyzed by calculating for instance the average scores and the intra- and inter observer reliability.
Final goal is to develop an itembank of approximately 300 items for the paper based test versions and several formats of the practical tests, so a large variety of test versions can be established. Candidates then can get a different, but parallel test version in each country. Additional is the translation of the items in the languages of all countries involved.
All assessors must be trained to maintain the testing conditions of both the paper based tests and the practical test similar all over the countries and circumstances. Then the test results of one country can be compared with the test results of the other countries.
The initial training of assessors can be done on an general and international level. For instance two or tree assessors of each country involved in the European Standard of forestry Work can be selected to get their elementary training. They then can also discuss the necessary adjustments on a national level, for instance because safety regulation procedures differ per country.
These trained assessors must then train the other assessors in their own country. It can be recommended that to establish objective assessments in all countries, the first national training meetings must be visited or supported by members of the international Committee of the European Standard of Forestry Work or by auditors of the international accreditation organization, including translators.
To enhance the transparency of the certifications system a common accessible and updated database with all relevant data of certified forestry workers must be developed. This database must not only contain data about the certified forestry workers, but also about test data and places, data of the certified assessors involved in the certification system, data of education centres and examination possibilities and all other important documents and facts about the certification system.
An important part of a certification system is a method of verification of all certificates by establishing a general accessible list of certified forestry workers, per country. So every enterprise and every individual involved can check for themselves whether a certain forestry worker is certified and if so, when the validity period of his or her certificate is expired.
Finally the certification system must be supervised in a clear and acceptable way for all partner countries involved. So the way of supervision, for instance the inspection and review of all documents involved in the certification system and the sampling of test situations to audit, must be agreed upon and described in detail in a separate document.
Then the accreditation organization can execute these supervision agreements or have these supervision acts executed by partners in all countries. At first the goal of the supervision will be to get an accreditation of the certification system, in later years the goal of accreditation is to continue the accreditation of the certification system.
| Name | K | S | A | % | MC | open |
|
1.3 Basics of biology and ecology The relevant plant and animal species The endemic forest trees and their demands The forest environment Identify the important forest trees and shrubs in the seasonal course of the year. Recognise the most important forest trees from seeds, buds, leaves, needles, wood and bark. |
X | 5 | 4 | |||
| 1.5 Occupational safety | 20 | 13 | ||||
| 1.5.1 - The Basics safety at work and accident prevention | ||||||
| a. The rescue plan of action | X | |||||
| b. The most important legal regulations (federal and provincial) and liabilities. | X | |||||
| c. The company agreements. | X | |||||
| d. The operating instructions, instructions on accident prevention | X | |||||
| e. The technical regulations (e.g. norms, FPP-brochures) | X | |||||
| f. The importance of personal and group safety on workplaces. | x | X | ||||
| g. The inspection of the terrain and the tools. | X | X | X | |||
| h. The traffic safety prevention. | X | X | X | |||
| i. Master safe working procedure in forest work. | x | x | X | |||
| j. Use personal protections. | x | X | ||||
| k. Meet general safety standards | X | X | ||||
| l. Meet specific safety standards | x | X | ||||
| 1.5.2 - The basics of First Aid. | ||||||
| a. First aid measures in forest accidents, emergency measures (chain of emergency). | ||||||
| 1.5.3 - The basics of ergonomics. | 10 | 7 | ||||
| a. The ergonomic basics on human work. | X | |||||
| b. The four important aspects of force, work, performance, recreation. | X | |||||
| c. The position of body. | x | X | ||||
| d. The difference between static and dynamic work. | X | |||||
| e. The importance of work hygiene. | X | X | ||||
| f. The impact of stress at the place of work. | X | X | ||||
| g. The importance of proper nutrition and the need of liquid. | x | X | ||||
| h. The importance of working clothes and personal safety equipment. | x | X | ||||
| i. The importance of health protection at the place of work (gymnastics, recreation during breaks, running time of chainsaw). | x | X | ||||
| k. Master an ergonomic correct working procedure in forest work. | x | X | X | |||
| 2 Forest production and natural forestmanagement. | ||||||
| 2.1 Establishing and rejuvenating. | ||||||
| 2.1.1 The characteristics of the forestry work | 3 | 3 | ||||
| a. Localise the relief, slope and bearing strenght. | x | X | ||||
| b. Localise natural and artificial obstacles. | x | X | ||||
| c. Localise special elements like electric lines, closures etc. | x | X | ||||
| 2.1.2 The importance of site preparation. | 1 | 2 | ||||
| a. The preparation activities for regeneration areas (cleaning, scarification). | ||||||
| c. The preparation activities of plants. | ||||||
| 2.1.3 The processes of natural regeneration and forestmanagement. | 2 | 1 | ||||
| c. The differences between natural and artificial regeneration. | x | |||||
| 2.1.4 Cultivation methods of forest plants. | 2 | 2 | ||||
| b. How to handle tree plants. | X | X | ||||
| 2.1.5 Methods of artificial rejuvenation. | 4 | 3 | ||||
| a. Cultural operations to tend stands. | ||||||
| b. How to protect plantings. | ||||||
| d. How to tend. | ||||||
| e. How to thin. | x | X | ||||
| g. How to regulate growing space and mixture. | ||||||
| 2.1.6 Planting methods. | 4 | 3 | ||||
| a. The right time of planting. | ||||||
| b. Apply the most commonly used planting methods. | x | X | ||||
| c. Master all mechanical tasks in the tending of young saplings, regeneration and thickets. | ||||||
| d. Execute a thinning regime. | x | X | ||||
| 2.3 Developing and tending. | ||||||
| 2.3.2 Tending and pruning. | 5 | |||||
| b. The tending procedures during the phase of qualification (cleaning in a young stand). | ||||||
| c. How to cut to a diameter limit and maturation (thinning procedures). | x | X | ||||
| 3 Forest technology. | ||||||
| 3.1 Harvest of wood and other products. | ||||||
| 3.1.1 Harvesting procedures in general. | 10 | 7 | ||||
| c. The methods of harvesting wood. | ||||||
| 3.1.3 Techniques of logging. | ||||||
| a. Techniques of logging. | x | X | ||||
| b. How to log calamity wood. | ||||||
| c. Methods and techniques of debranching (limbing). | ||||||
| d. The cutting technique. | X | X | ||||
| e. The cross cutting technique of stems under tension. | x | X | ||||
| g. How to work up felled trees. | X | X | ||||
| h. How to work up galewood. | ||||||
| i. How to chop branches. | x | X | ||||
| j. How to process wind and snow damaged trees (salvage cutting). | ||||||
| 3.1.4 Manual wood extraction. | 5 | |||||
| a. The procedures for manual wood extraction. | ||||||
| b. Different felling techniques with chainsaw (power saw) and brushcutter. | x | X | ||||
| d. Measures for log extraction, protecting soil and remaining stand (state of wood, point of time, etc.). | ||||||
| 3.4 Operating, maintaining, repairing machinery and equipment. | ||||||
| 3.4.1 The technical basics of tools and equipment in forestry. | 8 | 6 | ||||
| b. The function of a two-stroke engine. | ||||||
| c. The function and importance of fuel / oils and hydraulic oils. | X | |||||
| d. The general principles of fuel transmittance. | ||||||
| e. The basics of machine maintenance. | x | X | ||||
| f. A forestry worker can read the user’s manual. | x | X | ||||
| g. The regulations for examination (inspection) (handling tools and equipment). | x | x | ||||
|
3.4.2 Devices and machines used for forest activities or forest technology. a The safety standards of these machines and tools : - The personal protections of these machines and tools. - The different parts of these machines and tools. A forestry worker also can : - place handles on tools. - Run these machines and tools. |
15 | 10 | ||||
| a.4 Turning hook | X | X | X | |||
| a.5 Felling lever | X | X | X | |||
| a.11 Power saws | X | X | X | |||
| a.12 Brush Cutters | X | X | X | |||
| 5 Communication and social skills. | ||||||
| 5.1 Social relationships. | ||||||
| 5.1.1 The effects and importance of social relationships. | 6 | 1 | ||||
| a. The relationships between man and working-place. | x | x | X | |||
| b. The effects of a group / team work. | x | x | X | |||
| c. The importance of communication in the undertaking. | X | X | X | |||
| d. Support and improve team and group work. | x | x | x | |||
| 100 | 60 | 2 |